Flashers shouldn't be helping Apple in their ridiculous quest to destroy Flash anyway…
This is good news as far as I'm concerned.
C'mon Flash Developers – you have to stand for principle at some point.

On (online) conferences, video tutorials and e.g. Adobe TV the presenters often use Macs and thus promote the use of the Mac.
Maybe they should move to PC's or at least draw an evil face on the Apple logo ;-)

güncel kaliteli ve en güzelporno izle|pornovideolar?n? indirmeden bir tikla izleyin

I completely disagree with your post. Apple does not have a right to set up their own framework and SDK? Did Adobe go to Apple and discuss their plans to let Flash CS5 compile to native iPhone apps before spending huge resources and countless hours on a hack?

I think I prefer Visual Basic as a programming language and that's what I'd like to use in Flash but, you know what, it doesn't matter what I want – ActionScript is the programming language of the Flash platform. Period. You want to develop for the IPhone – better learn Objective C. Period.

I've made my living off of Flash for the past 10 years. I do nothing but Flash, Flex, and Captivate – the 3 software programs by Adobe whose sole purpose is to create swf files but I gotta side with Apple on this one. What percentage of the apps in the app store today were created with cross-compiling ports . . . not many.

I see absolutely no disrespect to their developers by Apple at all on this. Apple releases the SDK (the rules), Developers work by those rules (en masse) and the App store is an unprecedented success that has yet to be matched in the marketplace.

Looking forward to Adobe's response and playing with my iPad and iPhone.

[...] are already a bunch of posts and commentary on the Apple SDK update prohibiting applications that link to Documented APIs [...]

Really? Bizarre, reading from all the emotionally infused and childish posts of the so called evangelists, Adobe has declared jihad on Apple because they didn't want to include the player long time ago. So if Apple doesn't want a certain technology in THEIR device they are fighting somebody? Just read the facts: can you point me to ANY device that actually play in a good way Flash? Read about the JooJoo tablet and how Adobe evangelists featured it until somebody tried it for real and Adobe backpedaled immediately when the Flash performance was shitty at best.

When you guys will learn to watch past over the “Alien Attack” game demo on Palm webOS to realize how shitty the performance really is? Mark Doherty has recently released a video on his blog, and keep saying “wow, look, it is very good, really high quality” even when the Flash player was displaying the video at 2 frame per second while normally should 30 frame per second.

Let's see the things in a different prospective: Flash has 98% of market penetration so it is a dominant technology (maybe not, according to the SEC filing of yesterday where Adobe forecast losses, but that's another story) why I should be forced to use ActionScript to write applications running on Flash Player? Why I can't publish my own plugin that gets installed along Flash Player but only a few elite selected by Adobe can? (Check Octoshape Plugin on CNN) and I can continue….

You guys are passionate, I give you that, but something you should free your passion and get more on the reasoning side.

Maybe you should re-read my comment…. you're comparing a text editor to a compiler to a runtime environment. You want to write a replacement for XCode? Do it, the compiler is free and open source (as is the vast majority of MacOSX), what Apple say is that the output of such process should adhere to certain protocol.

I never mentioned Halo built in Flash, but certainly playing Space Invader of 1982 is a thing I can pass on as well (especially, as you mention, the performance is “good as it's going to get”).

And I don't want to write a plug-in, google for “Octoshape flash” and you will understand what I'm talking about.

Passion should not equate to blindness.

So you're commenting on something you don't know at all? It is difficult to communicate if the only thing you are (eventually) aware of is only half of the story, but I respect your choice and opinions.

Regarding the cheering on 9/11 pretty much the rest of the world agreed they were idiot. If you're happy to stay on that camp, have fun…

In the beta I had of cs5, the Flash to iPhone app I made was over 12mb and it was a simple form. On my iphone, I have 3d games (developed in ObjectC) that are under 8mb. That is the best part about any C related language, it's fast and PERFECT for mobile development. Why would a customer want to fill their phone with bloated apps when they can get a more efficient one, developed in a smaller version of C (Objective C)?

What language do you think powers most of the major apps you use day to day? Look at Chrome and how sexy its performance is. Why would Steve Jobs allow any other language other than C to develop on his products? Remember, he was a developer once and he knows the C is the best of the best.

I'm asking you this: why should developers bloat their apps using a Flash to iPhone solution when C makes the apps faster, flexible, and way more efficient? I don't mind Flash and Actionacript 3. Colin Moock is a legend but Flash has it's place. However it's not on the iPhone, nor will it ever be. Objective C is the best of the best for developing apps on the iPhone. No phone that I've used has the responsiveness of as iPhone/iPad. Scrolling through list views are incredibly smooth and you barely have to touch the screen. C is so lovely, I'm pleading with you to try it out. It's like cussing in French: wiping your ass with silk.